(no subject)

Date: 2011-10-22 05:07 pm (UTC)
If they can't write a convincing tweet I'm not encouraged by the thought of their novels.
This is it exactly. The way a writer talks about their writing is going to reflect the way they actually write. If they can't engage me in 140 characters then I doubt they can engage me over 50,000 words.

I should reread Kavalier and Clay. My memories of it are that it reminded me of a Paul Auster novel--not a bad book by any means, just leaning way more towards litfic or realistic fic with some superhero themes surrounding it.

I hate how litfic-with-genre-trappings has become a Thing, and how people are using to be even more obnoxious about genre fic.
It's so sneaky, in a way. I blame Margaret Atwood a little. It can be really frustrating to pick up what looks like a cool book and get 50 pages in and realize that the time travel in it isn't really time travel, it's just a metaphor for loneliness. Or something.

Oooh, I hope you can resurrect your novel! I've just about decided upon starting to work on a new idea--I don't entirely trust myself with old ideas in NaNo.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

kleenexwoman: A caricature of me looking future-y.  (Default)
Rachel

April 2015

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829 30  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags