![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
So I'm looking over ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
fandom_wank, and there's a lot of nittering over what's appropriate in concrit. Here is a debate topic for today: What is the point of leaving concrit on a final draft? Do authors routinely fix errors right on the entry? (I've seen this in a few fic communities with people pointing out minor grammatical or factual errors.) Is concrit on one story applicable to future stories, something to keep in mind when writing your next epic? Not making the same mistakes? How does one apply story-specific concrit to one's body of work in general? DISCUSS.
I'm not that used to receiving concrit, myself; the only time I've ever gotten a thorough critique of a story was in Fiction Collective. Thus, I'm also not used to editing my stories, and I don't really know what to do with concrit that's not extremely specific. I can't tell what suggestions to take, and I don't know how to implement the suggestions that I do take. Is there a class for this? Editing Your Stories 101? Or is it just a skill that comes with time and effort?
For example, I have a short story I've been considering submitting to the Central Review. I just put it up on my writing journal; the story is All the Pieces.
( Background for the story )
I've been opening up the document, staring at it, staring at the notes I took for how to improve it, and then giving up and closing it down every week for the entire summer (and I've been doing the same thing with some poems I wrote and the critiques from Poet's Collective). This has been going on all. Summer. Long. "Time to edit! Uh. What do I do? Shit, let's watch a movie instead." It's probably one of those things that are easy to do once you get started, but, as with many things, it's difficult to pick a place to start. (And I'm not even sure if I want to edit the thing at all. Again, how do you tell good concrit from bad concrit? Rather, how do you pick out things you want to change and leave alone the things you don't?)
fandom_wank, and there's a lot of nittering over what's appropriate in concrit. Here is a debate topic for today: What is the point of leaving concrit on a final draft? Do authors routinely fix errors right on the entry? (I've seen this in a few fic communities with people pointing out minor grammatical or factual errors.) Is concrit on one story applicable to future stories, something to keep in mind when writing your next epic? Not making the same mistakes? How does one apply story-specific concrit to one's body of work in general? DISCUSS. I'm not that used to receiving concrit, myself; the only time I've ever gotten a thorough critique of a story was in Fiction Collective. Thus, I'm also not used to editing my stories, and I don't really know what to do with concrit that's not extremely specific. I can't tell what suggestions to take, and I don't know how to implement the suggestions that I do take. Is there a class for this? Editing Your Stories 101? Or is it just a skill that comes with time and effort?
For example, I have a short story I've been considering submitting to the Central Review. I just put it up on my writing journal; the story is All the Pieces.
( Background for the story )
I've been opening up the document, staring at it, staring at the notes I took for how to improve it, and then giving up and closing it down every week for the entire summer (and I've been doing the same thing with some poems I wrote and the critiques from Poet's Collective). This has been going on all. Summer. Long. "Time to edit! Uh. What do I do? Shit, let's watch a movie instead." It's probably one of those things that are easy to do once you get started, but, as with many things, it's difficult to pick a place to start. (And I'm not even sure if I want to edit the thing at all. Again, how do you tell good concrit from bad concrit? Rather, how do you pick out things you want to change and leave alone the things you don't?)
